| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences |
| Date: | 2022-03-24 21:59:11 |
| Message-ID: | 74729cc5-960b-9295-912a-a7c37356a0c4@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Pushed, after going through the patch once more, addressed the remaining
FIXMEs, corrected a couple places in the docs and comments, etc. Minor
tweaks, nothing important.
I've been thinking about the grammar a bit more after pushing, and I
realized that maybe it'd be better to handle the FOR ALL TABLES /
SEQUENCES clause as PublicationObjSpec, not as a separate/special case.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2022-03-24 22:01:29 | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-24 21:58:22 | Re: New Object Access Type hooks |