| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | nospam(dot)bannisp(at)cwdom(dot)dm, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] [Keystone Slip # 14] Building pristine source on RedHat Alpha6.0 |
| Date: | 1999-07-29 15:28:23 |
| Message-ID: | 746.933262103@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Yikes. Is this the expected behavour? Does anyone else see this?
>> checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O -mieee # optimization -O2
>> removed because of egcs problem ) works... no
>> configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler
>> cannot create executables.
Yup, I see exactly the same thing when I add a # comment to CFLAGS in
my template file. I think it is only safe to put # comments on their
own lines in template files. A quick grep shows that linux_alpha is
the only template that violates that rule.
>>>> Hmm. That is strange. I thought the Makefile would honor the # and not
>>>> pass it through.
gmake might, but autoconf is a different story...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-07-29 15:32:01 | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-29 15:20:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Off-topic: autoconf guru |