Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 26 Oct 2026, at 20:45, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Given the lack of field complaints, I'm inclined to leave it as-is
>> in released branches (maybe it's not too late for v19, though).
> If we're leaving it as-is in backbranches, wouldn't it be better to opt for
> consistency and leave it in 19 as well and only adjust the documentation?
I don't particularly want to document the broken behavior (especially
if we'd have to further document that it will change in v20). That
would just contribute to user confusion. If you want docs to match
code I'd rather back-patch the code change.
regards, tom lane