Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Dang, me again eh? :-)
> Well, I'm available now and tomorrow to do any further work required.
Looking back at your original discussion of the bug,
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00234.php
I'm wondering why you chose option #3 rather than option #4?
I still find the proposed patch a bit crufty.
regards, tom lane