Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1

On Thursday 27 September 2007 08:22:46 Tom Lane wrote:
> We're so close I can almost taste it ... Here are the open tasks
> I can see, does anyone have others?
>
> * Review the one remaining patch from Simon that's on Bruce's patch
> queue page
> http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> (Everything else on that page is either dealt with, mentioned explicitly
> below, or simply a documentation improvement issue, which need not
> hold up beta1.)
>
> * Deal with the "#define FRONTEND" issue that Hiroshi Saito is working
> on (see "Warning is adjusted of pgbench" thread).
>
> * Decide whether we need to change CSVLOG output to emit virtual XIDs
> instead of, or perhaps in addition to, regular XIDs. I'm of the opinion
> that this has to happen, but there didn't seem much enthusiasm for it
> elsewhere.

I think it should be both

>
> * Pending patches for pre-existing bugs in contrib/pgcrypto --- this
> doesn't seem like a beta-stopper anyway.
>
> * What are we going to do with contrib/tsearch2? Probably not a beta
> stopper either, but it needs to be decided.
>
> * Do we bump the .so major version number for libpq? I think we should
> because there are two new exported functions since 8.2, and on at least
> some platforms there's nothing else than major number to disambiguate
> whether a client needs these or not. Comments?

+1 on the bump

>
> * Draft release notes --- can't really ship a beta without these,
> else beta testers won't know what to test. Traditionally this has
> taken a fair amount of time, but I wonder whether we couldn't use
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/WhatsNew83
> for at least the first cut.
>
> I think we could possibly release 8.3beta1 on Monday, or certainly
> next week sometime. And I don't know about anyone else, but I'm
> antsy to get this thing out the door ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--

Darcy Buskermolen
The PostgreSQL company, Command Prompt Inc.
http://www.commandprompt.com/