Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.
Date: 2010-08-14 13:23:33
Message-ID: 7305.1281792213@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No doubt, but the TODO entry you removed is still 100% accurately
>> worded, and what's more the archive entry it links to clearly describes
>> exactly the point at issue, namely that grouping by a PK *isn't*
>> indeterminate. You were wrong to remove it.

> OK, I put it back, but I still feel we might not need it anymore.

Even if you're willing to believe that the questions will stop once
we have this feature, that won't happen for more than a year.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-14 13:37:21 pgsql: MyBackendId now needs to be PGDLLIMPORT, so that contrib modules
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-08-14 13:02:22 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-14 13:30:49 Re: BUG #5608: array_agg() consumes too much memory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-14 13:21:42 Re: WIP partial replication patch