Re: Set fallback_application_name for a walreceiver to cluster_name

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Set fallback_application_name for a walreceiver to cluster_name
Date: 2019-02-27 10:02:18
Message-ID: 71d3a417-5607-8036-1970-8c56d61ac339@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-02-21 01:36, Euler Taveira wrote:
>> By default, the fallback_application_name for a physical walreceiver is
>> "walreceiver". This means that multiple standbys cannot be
>> distinguished easily on a primary, for example in pg_stat_activity or
>> synchronous_standby_names.
>>
> Although standby identification could be made by client_addr in
> pg_stat_activity, it could be useful in multiple clusters in the same
> host. Since it is a fallback application name, it can be overridden by
> an application_name in primary_conninfo parameter.

Yeah, plus that doesn't help with synchronous_standby_names.

>> I propose, if cluster_name is set, use that for
>> fallback_application_name in the walreceiver. (If it's not set, it
>> remains "walreceiver".) If someone set cluster_name to identify their
>> instance, we might as well use that by default to identify the node
>> remotely as well. It's still possible to specify another
>> application_name in primary_conninfo explicitly.
>>
> I tested it and both patches work as described. Passes all tests. Doc
> describes the proposed feature. Doc builds without errors.

Committed, thanks!

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-02-27 10:04:33 Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2019-02-27 10:00:12 Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take