Re: Question about gettext licensing

From: "Vikram Patil" <vpatil(at)actuate(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about gettext licensing
Date: 2009-08-05 18:17:22
Message-ID: 71F491F5DA99604A80DE49424BF3D02B0C660A5E@exchange8.actuate.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Hey Peter,

I forgot to mention that I am trying to build on windows. So I am
not using libreadline.
Thanks for your valuable help.

Thanks & Regards,
Vikram

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 12:57 AM
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Vikram Patil
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Question about gettext licensing

On Tuesday 04 August 2009 01:35:36 Vikram Patil wrote:
> I was concerned about gettext licensing. I was able to
build
> PostgreSql with gettext library. But this project is distributed under
> GNU license.
>
> So I would like to know if we want to distribute product commercially
> under different licenses, will it be okay ? If not then what approach
> usually companies, which distribute PostgreSql as database, follow?

The gettext package contains the processing tools, but the run-time
support is
in your C library. So this is not different from compiling with GCC
while the
run-time support is again in the C library.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-08-12 00:30:19 Please help with list of features for Alpha1 Release
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-08-05 15:39:40 Re: Question about gettext licensing