Re: Question about gettext licensing

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Vikram Patil <vpatil(at)actuate(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Question about gettext licensing
Date: 2009-08-05 15:39:40
Message-ID: 20090805153940.GE28595@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:56:47AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 01:35:36 Vikram Patil wrote:
> > I was concerned about gettext licensing. I was able to build
> > PostgreSql with gettext library. But this project is distributed
> > under GNU license.
> >
> > So I would like to know if we want to distribute product
> > commercially under different licenses, will it be okay ? If not
> > then what approach usually companies, which distribute PostgreSql
> > as database, follow?
>
> The gettext package contains the processing tools, but the run-time
> support is in your C library. So this is not different from
> compiling with GCC while the run-time support is again in the C
> library.

The library you really need to think about is libreadline, which is
GPL, so if you ship a psql binary using it, your psql is also GPL.
This may or may not concern you.

If it does concern you, one alternative is to compile psql against
libedit. Another is not include readline support in it at all.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vikram Patil 2009-08-05 18:17:22 Re: Question about gettext licensing
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-08-05 07:56:47 Re: Question about gettext licensing