Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote
Date: 2000-01-03 07:05:20
Message-ID: 7199.946883120@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> Was "spaces instead of tabs" one of the voted-on options? That would
> make the tab issue moot, and would result in consistant appearance not
> matter what tab setting one is using.

Quite a good thought, actually. It'd be worth checking to see if there
is any material expansion in the source's disk footprint and/or the
size of a compressed tarball after getting rid of tabs entirely.
I'd be willing to vote for this if the space penalty is not large...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-01-03 07:08:41 Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-03 06:28:11 Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test