From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote |
Date: | 2000-01-03 23:00:50 |
Message-ID: | 38712A22.6C9F711B@tm.ee |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> > Was "spaces instead of tabs" one of the voted-on options? That would
> > make the tab issue moot, and would result in consistant appearance not
> > matter what tab setting one is using.
>
> Quite a good thought, actually. It'd be worth checking to see if there
> is any material expansion in the source's disk footprint and/or the
> size of a compressed tarball after getting rid of tabs entirely.
> I'd be willing to vote for this if the space penalty is not large...
Me too!
And, there already is an utility to entab/detab in tools section, so people
can use it if they absolutely must have tabs in their source.
AFAIK most decent editors also can [en/de]tab the source they are editing.
So my vote would be 4-space indents, no tabs
--------------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-01-03 23:18:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-01-03 22:56:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source |