Re: Cygwin linking rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cygwin linking rules
Date: 2018-09-29 20:06:46
Message-ID: 7125.1538251606@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Not sure where to go from here.

What would happen if we stopped building libpq.a, so that the
linker didn't have any choice about what to do?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2018-09-29 21:25:37 Re: MERGE SQL statement for PG12
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-09-29 20:04:17 Re: executor relation handling