Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, Postgres Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>, Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps
Date: 2023-07-12 10:08:22
Message-ID: 710ff890-fff7-cafe-67ca-31a0d4c25a78@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12.07.23 09:42, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> These two variants show the two extremes; bare minimum vs. everything
> but the kitchen sink. So one may feel the need to find a middle ground
> and provide a "sufficient, but not too much" variant. I have attempted
> that in variants 3 and 4; also attached.

If you end up with variant 3 or 4, please use double quotes instead of
single quotes.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-07-12 10:08:43 Re: doc: improve the restriction description of using indexes on REPLICA IDENTITY FULL table.
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-12 09:54:18 Re: DROP DATABASE is interruptible