Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Date: 2011-02-17 15:19:14
Message-ID: 7107.1297955954@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2011/2/17 Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>:
>> We need to fix inet support as Tom complained and then will commit.

> I think those are two separate issues.

Yeah ... also, fixing the inet problem looked to me like it'd probably
be a major compatibility break (change in on-disk index contents).
Not something to rush into at the end of a development cycle.

In any case, I was pointing to that as a reason that btree_gist wasn't
ready to be in core. It has nothing to do with KNN-ifying the module.
I would like to see that happen before 9.1, else KNN will go out with
not very many actual use-cases supported.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-17 15:22:30 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-17 15:09:37 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix blatantly uninitialized variable in recent commit.

Browse pgsql-rrreviewers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-17 21:43:12 Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-17 11:34:25 Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)