Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes
Date: 2000-06-16 14:46:35
Message-ID: 7022.961166795@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net> writes:
> Not all of my Linux/Alpha patches are related to fmgr, there are a
> few related to s_lock and such (which can probably be put into the source
> tree with #ifdefs).

Right-o. Up to now we haven't worried about that, but now that the
fundamental problem is fixed (I hope), we can start cleaning up the
smaller details so that Linux/Alpha will be supported out-of-the-box.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-06-16 14:50:38 Re: Changes to functions and triggers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-16 14:44:19 Re: Changes to functions and triggers

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug Edmunds 2000-06-16 17:21:04 Regression test results not the same
Previous Message Ryan Kirkpatrick 2000-06-16 13:14:22 Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes