Re: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing
Date: 2023-05-17 19:21:25
Message-ID: 6bda67b3-39c1-96d2-f35d-f5f889ca7f2d@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/17/23 3:19 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-05-16 10:30:27 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> On 5/6/23 1:30 PM, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>>
>>> I've done that in the attached v5.
>>
>> [RMT hat]
>>
>> RMT nudge on this thread, as we're approaching the Beta 1 cutoff. From the
>> above discussion, it sounds like it's pretty close to being ready.
>
> Thanks for the nudge. I just pushed the changes, with some very minor changes
> (a newline, slight changes in commit messages).
>
> I'll go and mark the item as closed.

Nice! Thank you,

Jonathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-05-17 19:23:13 Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-05-17 19:19:24 Re: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing