Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com" <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>, "jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "hannuk(at)google(dot)com" <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Date: 2021-09-07 18:40:24
Message-ID: 6FEECA73-709B-4896-836D-B481AA4678EB@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/7/21, 11:31 AM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I guess we still have to pick one or the other, but I don't really
> know how to do that, since both methods seem to be relatively fine,
> and the scenarios where one is better than the other all feel a little
> bit contrived. I guess if no clear consensus emerges in the next week
> or so, I'll just pick one and commit it. Not quite sure yet how I'll
> do the picking, but we seem to all agree that something is better than
> nothing, so hopefully nobody will be too sad if I make an arbitrary
> decision. And if some clear agreement emerges before then, even
> better.

I will be happy to see this fixed either way.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-09-07 18:41:57 Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-09-07 18:31:33 Re: EXPLAIN(VERBOSE) to CTE with SEARCH BREADTH FIRST fails