Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com, jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, hannuk(at)google(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Date: 2021-09-08 06:16:32
Message-ID: 20210908.151632.636932907306042031.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Tue, 7 Sep 2021 18:40:24 +0000, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote in
> On 9/7/21, 11:31 AM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I guess we still have to pick one or the other, but I don't really
> > know how to do that, since both methods seem to be relatively fine,
> > and the scenarios where one is better than the other all feel a little
> > bit contrived. I guess if no clear consensus emerges in the next week
> > or so, I'll just pick one and commit it. Not quite sure yet how I'll
> > do the picking, but we seem to all agree that something is better than
> > nothing, so hopefully nobody will be too sad if I make an arbitrary
> > decision. And if some clear agreement emerges before then, even
> > better.
>
> I will be happy to see this fixed either way.

+1. I agree about the estimation on performance gain to Nathan.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-09-08 06:28:17 Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-09-08 06:15:16 Re: Gather performance analysis