Re: Replication Using Triggers

From: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
To: gordan(at)bobich(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication Using Triggers
Date: 2008-01-18 18:23:30
Message-ID: 6E2AF622-C58E-4124-BC15-305BCD690318@myemma.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:37 AM, gordan(at)bobich(dot)net wrote:
>>
>> That's one thing. The other problem that most trigger based
>> replication systems have problems with is propogating schema
>> changes - because (I think) you can attach triggers to schema
>> changes.
>
> I presume you mean that you cannot attach triggers to schema
> changes. Yes, I had thought of that a minute ago. I don't suppose
> this could be deemed a feature request for CREATE/ALTER/DROP schema
> level triggers? ;)

I'm sure he did. Also, there was a little bit of discussion a week
or so ago about ddl & ddl/dml (such as TRUNCATE) triggers. With the
imminent release of 8.3, now's the time to pipe up with feature
requests.

Erik Jones

DBA | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Jones 2008-01-18 18:30:49 Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving
Previous Message Darcy Buskermolen 2008-01-18 18:18:06 Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving