| From: | Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Updated macOS start scripts |
| Date: | 2017-11-15 18:13:21 |
| Message-ID: | 6D443E39-13C2-4185-9FE4-B5CB416AB06E@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Nov 15, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> The stuff in contrib/start-scripts/osx/ does not, as far as I know,
> work at all on any recent release of macOS, because SystemStarter
> is long gone. I propose replacing it with the attached, which
> I've tested on current-vintage Macs.
>
I tested the presence of SystemStarter, which the old implementation
uses, and launchd and launchctl, which your new implementation uses,
on a couple of my mac laptops:
OS X 10.11.6
SystemStarter - not installed
launchd - installed
launchctl - installed
OS X 10.6.8
SystemStarter - installed
launchd - installed
launchctl - installed
According to Wikipedia:
"SystemStarter appears to have been removed from OS X 10.10 and later (reference needed)."
and
"In Mac OS X v10.4, it was deprecated in favor of launchd"
Overall, I think supporting 10.10 and greater is more relevant than continuing
to support 10.4 and earlier, though I suppose someone could argue for
keeping both in side-by-side files with the README directing users which to
use for whichever version of OS X they happen to be running. It's of no
consequence to me, since my oldest mac is running 10.6.8, but somebody
from the museum of old macs might feel differently.
mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-11-15 18:35:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-11-15 18:03:54 | Re: pspg - psql pager |