Re: Updated macOS start scripts

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updated macOS start scripts
Date: 2017-11-15 19:00:33
Message-ID: 21689.1510772433@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Nov 15, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The stuff in contrib/start-scripts/osx/ does not, as far as I know,
>> work at all on any recent release of macOS, because SystemStarter
>> is long gone. I propose replacing it with the attached, which
>> I've tested on current-vintage Macs.

> Overall, I think supporting 10.10 and greater is more relevant than continuing
> to support 10.4 and earlier, though I suppose someone could argue for
> keeping both in side-by-side files with the README directing users which to
> use for whichever version of OS X they happen to be running. It's of no
> consequence to me, since my oldest mac is running 10.6.8, but somebody
> from the museum of old macs might feel differently.

Well, we have no buildfarm coverage before 10.4, so to my mind those
releases are desupported already. In practice I wonder whether anyone
is really running PG on such old releases anyway. Certainly I wouldn't
think they'd be making new PG installations on machines that old.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-11-15 19:05:45 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-11-15 18:57:35 Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II