Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date: 2008-05-28 12:25:14
Message-ID: 6C0D13F6-D160-49B0-9FDD-82DF9456C97F@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc


On 23-May-08, at 9:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
>> Any word on 8.3.2 ?
>
> Obviously, nothing is happening during PGCon ;-)
>
> There was some discussion a week or so back about scheduling a set of
> releases in early June, but it's not formally decided.
>

Now that PGCon is over has there been any more discussion ?

Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-05-28 13:39:10 Re: Outer joins and equivalence
Previous Message Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway 2008-05-28 12:08:14 pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-28 14:24:51 Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-05-23 13:20:21 Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work