Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date: 2008-05-28 14:24:51
Message-ID: 27924.1211984691@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> On 23-May-08, at 9:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There was some discussion a week or so back about scheduling a set of
>> releases in early June, but it's not formally decided.

> Now that PGCon is over has there been any more discussion ?

Yeah, I just posted an announcement about it on -hackers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-28 14:27:19 Re: pg_regress: referencing shared objects from tests
Previous Message Jorgen Austvik - Sun Norway 2008-05-28 14:12:56 pg_regress: dbname in PostgreSQL test suite

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message U. George 2008-05-28 19:09:47 ResultSet & setFetchSize fails to stop heap failures
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2008-05-28 12:25:14 Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work