| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? |
| Date: | 2006-09-15 08:39:00 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA356A7@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
>>> 'cause the Funds Group needs somewhere to park a CMS.
>>
>> Why does the Funds Group need a separate CMS?
>>
>
>Several reasons:
>
>1. Storing of private donation records for reference between
>officer to officer
How is this a feature of a CMS? That sounds more like the feature of a
database.. (hey, we have one of those!)
>2. Storing of publicized project ideas and plans
That's kind of what www does good now, no?
>3. Dealing with web votes
I don't see how that's a specific CMS feature either. BTW, we do have a
working survey system on the website now, which does pretty much that.
It's not really use dbecause nobody posts new surveys, but it works.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-09-15 13:19:25 | Re: BuildFarm needs better visibility ... |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-15 03:54:12 | Re: BuildFarm needs better visibility ... |