Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?

Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>> 'cause the Funds Group needs somewhere to park a CMS.
>>> Why does the Funds Group need a separate CMS?
>>>
>> Several reasons:
>>
>> 1. Storing of private donation records for reference between
>> officer to officer
>
> How is this a feature of a CMS? That sounds more like the feature of a
> database.. (hey, we have one of those!)

Going to ignore this.

>
>
>> 2. Storing of publicized project ideas and plans
>
> That's kind of what www does good now, no?
>

No, it doesn't. The funds group CMS is meant to be more of an intranet.

>
>> 3. Dealing with web votes
>
> I don't see how that's a specific CMS feature either. BTW, we do have a
> working survey system on the website now, which does pretty much that.
> It's not really use dbecause nobody posts new surveys, but it works.

Votes are private and must be authenticated. The funds groups already
has code for this.

Joshua D. Drake

>
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/