From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Getting better Google search results |
Date: | 2006-08-29 07:56:50 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA355DE@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Wouldn't this be better on -www? :-P
> I had an idea while discussing the limitations of our searching on
> irc with a few folks. As far as Google putting old 7.x and 6.x
> documentation results up, why not create a new subdomain such as
> oldocs.postgres.org and stick anything older than a version of two
> there. We could still link to it, and leave some redirects in place
> for old links, but the new subdomain would ensure that they would
> have relatively *low* Google results compared to the more recent
> docs, which is what we want.
Don't we have enough silly domains already? If we want to get rid of
those hits, why don't we just add a robots.txt and tell google not to
index the old docs at all? (If people *need* hits in the old docs, they
can always hit our own search engine for those docs)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hans-Juergen Schoenig | 2006-08-29 10:32:59 | Re: database contest results |
Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2006-08-29 07:49:41 | [ignore this and previous email] Re: database contest results |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-08-29 08:11:32 | Re: A counter productive conversation about search. |
Previous Message | John Hansen | 2006-08-29 07:51:32 | Re: A counter productive conversation about search. |