Re: Upcoming re-releases

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Florian Weimer" <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upcoming re-releases
Date: 2006-02-11 20:26:29
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F77C@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > The way our Kerberos implementation is done, it does *not* validate
> > the server, just the client. If you want server
> verification, you must
> > use a combination of both Kerberos and SSL.
>
> Eh? We use mutual authentication in Kerberos...

We do? That's good then :-) I was told by someone that we don't. Never
really checked into it, since all my installations already use SSL for
that. So, I'll retract my comment ;)

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-02-11 20:31:42 Re: SpeedComparison
Previous Message Jochem van Dieten 2006-02-11 20:21:43 Re: SpeedComparison