| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance |
| Date: | 2005-10-25 12:37:33 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E7A9@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > OK, running the latest patch. Observations:
> > > ...
> > > I ran tests for about an hour, randomly killing/canceling
> backends
> > > without any problems.
> >
> > Are we all comfortable that
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
> > is OK to apply?
>
> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).
> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.
Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
until now.
Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
is.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-25 12:58:39 | Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-10-25 12:25:21 | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance |