| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance |
| Date: | 2005-10-25 15:16:29 |
| Message-ID: | 14410.1130253389@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>>> Are we all comfortable that
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
>>> is OK to apply?
>>
>> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).
>> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.
> Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
> until now.
> Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
> in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
> is.
OK, patch committed. Please recheck that CVS tip is OK.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Frost | 2005-10-25 15:55:06 | Re: Replaying archived wal files after a dump restore? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-25 13:47:52 | Re: sort_mem statistics ... |