David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks for chipping in on this. Can you confirm if you think this
> should apply to VACUUM options? We're not talking GUCs here.
My druthers would be to treat them similarly to GUCs.
I recognize that I might be in the minority, and that doing
so would entail touching a lot of existing messages in this
area. Nonetheless, I think this area is not being consistent
with our wider conventions, which is why for example defGetString
is out of step with these messages.
regards, tom lane