Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hironobu SUZUKI <hironobu(at)interdb(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function
Date: 2020-04-01 16:03:35
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Fabien,

On 2/1/20 5:12 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Attached is an attempt at improving things. I have added a explicit note
> and hijacked an existing example to better illustrate the purpose of the
> function.

This patch does not build on Linux due to some unused functions and

The CF entry has been updated to Waiting on Author.

A few committers have expressed doubts about whether this patch is
needed and it doesn't make sense to keep moving it from CF to CF.

I'm planning to mark this patch RwF on April 8 and I suggest you
resubmit if you are able to get some consensus.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-01 16:12:24 Re: A bug when use get_bit() function for a long bytea string
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-04-01 16:03:20 Re: proposal \gcsv