Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
Date: 2005-12-20 22:18:49
Message-ID: 6829.1135117129@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
> are there any plans to integrate this

I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
I am).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-20 23:13:15 Re: localization problem (and solution)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-20 22:16:07 Re: horology regression test failure

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-12-21 01:26:35 Re: PLpgSQL: list of scalars as row for assign stmt, fore
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2005-12-20 21:47:50 Re: PLpgSQL: list of scalars as row for assign stmt, fore and fors stm