Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ...
Date: 2005-12-21 07:50:03
Message-ID: 1135151404.3575.6.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2005-12-20 kell 17:18, kirjutas Tom Lane:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > i was just wondering about the status of hannu's concurrent vacuum patch.
> > are there any plans to integrate this
>
> I still don't trust it (assuming that you're thinking of the same patch
> I am).

What could I do to increase your trust in it ?

Could you think of any specific case it could break ? Or any specific
tests to check for it ?

I attach the version of the patch for 8.1.0 for anyone interested in
checking it.

--------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Pitt 2005-12-21 08:38:12 Re: horology regression test failure
Previous Message Martin Pitt 2005-12-21 07:21:27 Re: horology regression test failure

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sagi Bashari 2005-12-21 12:18:51 BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8 encoding conversion
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2005-12-21 07:38:05 Re: PLpgSQL: list of scalars as row for assign stmt, fore and fors stm