Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Date: 2017-03-01 13:36:55
Message-ID: 67d35333-ef65-074a-b2be-52440f245e43@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/22/17 18:24, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 2/22/17 12:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2/22/17 10:14, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW tmv AS SELECT * FROM pg_subscription;
>>> SELECT 0
>>>
>>> IOW, you can create matviews that depend on any other
>>> table/view/matview, but right now if the matview includes certain items
>>> it will mysteriously end up empty post-restore.
>>
>> Yes, by that logic matview refresh should always be last.
>
> Patches for head attached.
>
> RLS was the first item added after DO_REFRESH_MATVIEW, which was added
> in 9.5. So if we want to treat this as a bug, they'd need to be patched
> as well, which is a simple matter of swapping 33 and 34.

I wonder whether we should emphasize this change by assigning
DO_REFRESH_MATVIEW a higher number, like 100?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-01 13:47:15 Re: \h tab-completion
Previous Message David Rowley 2017-03-01 12:02:19 Patch to improve performance of replay of AccessExclusiveLock