Re: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER vs. pg_dump, etc.

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER vs. pg_dump, etc.
Date: 2026-08-11 00:26:52
Message-ID: 67d071b50440559f18f18ddd73ad82c69b97d284.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2026-08-10 at 11:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Looks good to me, I guess we'll have to see whether it satisfies
> Coverity.  (But if not, we can just dismiss that complaint.)

Thank you. After we unfreeze, I will commit and backport to 19.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-08-11 00:56:22 Re: plpython tests fail against python 3.14 under Valgrind
Previous Message Robert Haas 2026-08-11 00:13:01 Re: Bypassing cursors in postgres_fdw to enable parallel plans