| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-03-22 14:32:03 |
| Message-ID: | 675ACCB9-8C90-4166-8DF2-680EDD7C0207@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 22 Mar 2016, at 14:21, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 14:10 +0000, Justin Clift wrote:
>>
>> For a 10.0 release, that's a very major jump from the 9.x series.
>>
>> The question is... are we there yet?
>>
>> Is so, then yay :)... if not though, what is the bar we need to reach?
>>
>> eg Transparent multi-master replication built-in to core? ;)
>
> We always have 11.0. :-)
"For this release, we turned the volume up to 11!" :)
+ Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-03-22 15:10:38 | Re: Oracle's letter to Russian IT companies |
| Previous Message | Jonathan Katz | 2016-03-22 14:30:41 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |