| From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Updatable views |
| Date: | 2006-08-24 18:49:45 |
| Message-ID: | 66780EDBF7DA55F8A0B576E9@[172.26.14.247] |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
--On Donnerstag, August 24, 2006 11:00:45 -0400 Tom Lane
<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If the code is dependent on recognizing names to know what it's doing,
> then I'd say you have a fundamentally broken approach. Consider adding
> a flag column to pg_rewrite to distinguish these rules, instead.
This is the approach the code already follows (it uses an additional
ev_kind column which distinguishes rules between implicit rules with
no, local or cascaded check option and explicit ones).
Turns out that i was thinking too difficult when looking at the code which
drops implicit rules....sorry for the noise.
--
Thanks
Bernd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-08-24 18:55:11 | Intervals within information_schema |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2006-08-24 18:44:43 | Re: An Idea for planner hints |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-08-24 18:55:11 | Intervals within information_schema |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-08-24 16:02:43 | Re: Updatable views |