| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Updatable views |
| Date: | 2006-08-24 15:00:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5033.1156431645@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> writes:
> While working on Alvaro's suggestions to fix the code i got the opinion
> that we need to reject any attempts to name a user defined rule
> as
> "_INSERT"
> "_NOTHING_INSERT"
> "_DELETE"
> "_NOTHING_DELETE"
> "_UPDATE"
> "_NOTHING_UPDATE"
If the code is dependent on recognizing names to know what it's doing,
then I'd say you have a fundamentally broken approach. Consider adding
a flag column to pg_rewrite to distinguish these rules, instead.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-08-24 15:08:35 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
| Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2006-08-24 14:51:42 | Re: Updatable views |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2006-08-24 16:02:43 | Re: Updatable views |
| Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2006-08-24 14:51:42 | Re: Updatable views |