Re: Allow an alias to be attached directly to a JOIN ... USING

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Allow an alias to be attached directly to a JOIN ... USING
Date: 2021-03-19 07:12:00
Message-ID: 64f2b50d-861f-ee4f-4272-e668cee5a154@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 05.03.21 18:00, David Steele wrote:
> On 11/14/20 3:49 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2020-11-10 16:15, Georgios Kokolatos wrote:
>>> I noticed that this patch fails on the cfbot.
>>> For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> //Georgios
>>>
>>> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
>>
>> Here is a rebased and lightly retouched patch.
>
> There don't seem to be any objections to just documenting the slight
> divergence from the spec.
>
> So, does it make sense to just document that and proceed?

Yeah, I think that is not a problem.

I think Tom's input on the guts of this patch would be most valuable,
since it intersects a lot with the parse namespace refactoring he did.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-03-19 07:15:25 RE: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
Previous Message tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com 2021-03-19 06:53:29 RE: Disable WAL logging to speed up data loading