| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates |
| Date: | 2004-09-09 16:08:40 |
| Message-ID: | 6403.1094746120@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I talked to Greg via chat and it looks like '&' is the best choice for
> adding system object display:
> \d& shows system stuff
Yech, that's awful. It looks ugly and it commandeers a punctuation
symbol that we might wish to use for something else someday.
I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this.
Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike
Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the
time. However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry
with the behavior for tables. I don't really want to put up with a less
convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hervé Piedvache | 2004-09-09 16:09:19 | pg_autovacuum and v8.0 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-09-09 15:33:40 | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates |