Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: markw(at)osdl(dot)org
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Q(at)ping(dot)be, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us,markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Date: 2004-03-22 17:41:14
Message-ID: 6391.1079977274@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance

markw(at)osdl(dot)org writes:
> I could certainly do some testing if you want to see how DBT-2 does.
> Just tell me what to do. ;)

Just do some runs that are identical except for the wal_sync_method
setting. Note that this should not have any impact on SELECT
performance, only insert/update/delete performance.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-22 17:42:43 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous Message markw 2004-03-22 17:33:59 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-22 17:42:43 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2004-03-22 17:38:24 Re: [PATCHES] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use