Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking

From: markw(at)osdl(dot)org
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Q(at)ping(dot)be, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Date: 2004-03-25 21:46:56
Message-ID: 200403252147.i2PLkx209812@mail.osdl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On 22 Mar, Tom Lane wrote:
> markw(at)osdl(dot)org writes:
>> I could certainly do some testing if you want to see how DBT-2 does.
>> Just tell me what to do. ;)
>
> Just do some runs that are identical except for the wal_sync_method
> setting. Note that this should not have any impact on SELECT
> performance, only insert/update/delete performance.

Ok, here are the results I have from my 4-way xeon system, a 14 disk
volume for the log and a 52 disk volume for everything else:
http://developer.osdl.org/markw/pgsql/wal_sync_method.html

7.5devel-200403222

wal_sync_method metric
default (fdatasync) 1935.28
fsync 1613.92

# ./test_fsync -f /opt/pgdb/dbt2/pg_xlog/test.out
Simple write timing:
write 0.018787

Compare fsync times on write() and non-write() descriptor:
(If the times are similar, fsync() can sync data written
on a different descriptor.)
write, fsync, close 13.057781
write, close, fsync 13.311313

Compare one o_sync write to two:
one 16k o_sync write 6.515122
two 8k o_sync writes 12.455124

Compare file sync methods with one 8k write:
(o_dsync unavailable)
open o_sync, write 6.270724
write, fdatasync 13.275225
write, fsync, 13.359847

Compare file sync methods with 2 8k writes:
(o_dsync unavailable)
open o_sync, write 12.479563
write, fdatasync 13.651709
write, fsync, 14.000240

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-25 21:48:59 Re: HEAD compile troubles
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-03-25 21:09:07 Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qing Zhao 2004-03-25 22:20:56 Re: column size too large, is this a bug?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-25 19:10:55 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking