From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Subject: | Re: Testing LISTEN/NOTIFY more effectively |
Date: | 2019-07-27 22:48:30 |
Message-ID: | 6358.1564267710@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-07-27 15:39:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I just found out that on a slow enough machine
>> (prairiedog's host) there *is* some variation in when that test's
>> notices come out. I am unsure whether that's to be expected or
>> whether there's something wrong there
> Hm. Any chance you could show the diff? I don't immediately see why.
Sure. If I remove the client_min_messages hack from HEAD, then on
my dev workstation I get the attached test diff; that reproduces
quite reliably on a couple of machines. However, running that
diff on prairiedog's host gets the failure attached second more
often than not. (Sometimes it will pass.)
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
show-the-intended-notices.patch | text/x-diff | 5.5 KB |
regression.diffs | text/x-diff | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-07-27 22:57:58 | Re: tap tests driving the database via psql |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-07-27 22:37:58 | Re: tap tests driving the database via psql |