Re: tap tests driving the database via psql

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: tap tests driving the database via psql
Date: 2019-07-27 22:37:58
Message-ID: 20190727223758.mkky3xyekfytesqt@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2019-07-27 17:48:39 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 7/27/19 3:15 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I'm not volunteering to do 4), my perl skills aren't great (if the test
> > infra were python, otoh... I have the skeleton of a pure perl driver
> > that I used for testing somewhere). But I am leaning towards that being
> > the most reasonable choice.
>
> +1 for #4.
>
>
> I'll be happy to participate in any effort.
>
>
> About 22 years ago I wrote a pure perl implementation of a wire protocol
> of roughly similar complexity (RFC1459). I got it basically working in
> just a few days, so this sort of thing is very doable. Let's see your
> skeleton and maybe it's a good starting point.

The skeleton's in python though, not sure how helpful that is?

/me once more regrets that perl, not python, has been chosen as the
scripting language of choice for postgres...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-07-27 22:48:30 Re: Testing LISTEN/NOTIFY more effectively
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-07-27 22:20:52 Re: Testing LISTEN/NOTIFY more effectively