|From:||Dent John <denty(at)QQdd(dot)co(dot)uk>|
|To:||Massimo Fidanza <malix0(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Roman Pekar <roma(dot)pekar(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: [WIP] UNNEST(REFCURSOR): allowing SELECT to consume data from a REFCURSOR|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
Happy to help. And actually, end user (i.e., developer) feedback on the feature’s usefulness is probably one of the more important contributions.
> On 10 Feb 2021, at 08:57, Massimo Fidanza <malix0(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi John,
> Il giorno dom 7 feb 2021 alle ore 22:35 Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)co(dot)uk <mailto:denty(at)qqdd(dot)co(dot)uk>> ha scritto:
> Hi Massimo,
> Thanks for the interest, and my apologies for the late reply.
> I’m not particularly abandoning it, but I don’t have particular reason to make further changes at the moment. Far as I’m concerned it works, and the main question is whether it is acceptable and useful.
> I’d be happy if you have feedback that evolves it or might push it up the queue for commitfest review.
>> On 18 Jan 2021, at 23:09, Massimo Fidanza <malix0(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:malix0(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>> This is an interesting feature, but it seems that the author has abandoned development, what happens now? Will this be postponed from commitfest to commitfest and never be taken over by anyone?
>> Il giorno ven 6 mar 2020 alle ore 22:36 Dent John <denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu <mailto:denty(at)qqdd(dot)eu>> ha scritto:
>> > On 22 Feb 2020, at 10:38, Dent John <denty(at)QQdd(dot)eu <mailto:denty(at)QQdd(dot)eu>> wrote:
>> >> On 18 Feb 2020, at 03:03, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>> >> From the trivialities department, I see a bunch of warnings about
>> >> local declaration placement (we're still using C90 rules for those by
>> >> project policy):
>> >> […]
>> > […]
>> My bad. I missed on declaration.
>> Another patch attached.
|Next Message||Kuntal Ghosh||2021-02-19 09:36:41||Re: Extensibility of the PostgreSQL wire protocol|
|Previous Message||Konstantin Knizhnik||2021-02-19 08:51:35||Re: [PoC] Non-volatile WAL buffer|