Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I won't say we don't need more tests, but I don't see a particular
>> testing gap in this area.
> I am not saying that the existing test-case is not enough to test
> deferred constraints but, it would have been good to add test-cases
> having ROLLBACK statements with deferred constraints as well.
What exactly would that test, other than that ROLLBACK discards changes?
Which is a point that seems to me to be pretty well covered already.
regards, tom lane