Re: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
Date: 2022-03-24 23:42:37
Message-ID: 623D01ED.2070609@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/27/21 08:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> We can bikeshed the name of the flag at some stage. --procedures-only
> might also make sense

Any takers for --routines-only ?

"Routine" is the genuine, ISO SQL umbrella term for a function or
procedure, and we have used it that way in our docs and glossary.

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2022-03-24 23:50:44 Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-03-24 23:18:33 Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?