Re: Add a Nix flake

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add a Nix flake
Date: 2026-08-25 13:19:08
Message-ID: 618056.1787663948@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Historically we've been fairly resistant to carrying things related to
> how people build or develop postgres.

Yeah. I might hold my nose if the effects extended only to one more
root-level file (although that's not great). But if we're talking
about rather expansive .gitexclude patterns, I'm going to push back
on the grounds of possible unforeseen side-effects on other peoples'
work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-08-25 13:20:52 Re: Replace px_memset() with explicit_bzero()
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2026-08-25 13:00:14 Re: pg_stat_statements: a reset mid-query leaves an entry unnormalized forever