| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2021-08-24 19:36:22 |
| Message-ID: | 61254A36.5000706@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/24/21 15:12, Robert Haas wrote:
> I find it hard to
> believe that we would seriously consider replacing every direct GUC
> reference in the backend with something that goes through an API.
Peter may have advocated for that kind of across-the-board adoption;
my leaning is more to add an API that /can/ be adopted, initially with
separately-linked extensions as the audience. Nothing would stop it being
used in core as well, but no reason to change any site where it did not
offer an advantage.
I generally tend to be an incrementalist.
Regards,
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-08-24 19:41:58 | Re: [PATCH] Disable bgworkers during servers start in pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-08-24 19:12:45 | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT |