| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
| Date: | 2007-03-03 00:42:14 |
| Message-ID: | 61226.24.211.165.134.1172882534.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>> 1. In src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c, change DefineRelation as
>> follows:
>> * After the first call to heap_create_with_catalog, construct and
>> do another call to for the array type.
>
> I'm still not happy about the idea of doing this for every relation
> (and doing it for sequences and indexes would be the height of
> wastefulness). How about we only do it for composite types?
>
I'm not happy about that. I agree that indexes and sequences should not be
done, but can we please do plain table types? I would be OK if we skipped
catalog tables, if that would make you happier.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-03-03 00:45:21 | Re: Is there a way to run heap_insert() AFTER ExecInsertIndexTuples() ? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-03-03 00:38:33 | Re: Synchronized Scan update |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-03 02:40:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-02 23:59:50 | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |